@article {2018|2093, title = {Dystrophin{\textquoteright}s central domain forms a complex filament that becomes disorganized by in-frame deletions.}, journal = {J Biol Chem}, volume = {293}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 05 04}, pages = {6637-6646}, abstract = {

Dystrophin, encoded by the gene, is critical for maintaining plasma membrane integrity during muscle contraction events. Mutations in the gene disrupting the reading frame prevent dystrophin production and result in severe Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD); in-frame internal deletions allow production of partly functional internally deleted dystrophin and result in less severe Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). Many known BMD deletions occur in dystrophin\&$\#$39;s central domain, generally considered to be a monotonous rod-shaped domain based on the knowledge of spectrin family proteins. However, the effects caused by these deletions, ranging from asymptomatic to severe BMD, argue against the central domain serving only as a featureless scaffold. We undertook structural studies combining small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular modeling in an effort to uncover the structure of the central domain, as dystrophin has been refractory to characterization. We show that this domain appears to be a tortuous and complex filament that is profoundly disorganized by the most severe BMD deletion (loss of exons 45-47). Despite the preservation of large parts of the binding site for neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in this deletion, computational approaches failed to recreate the association of dystrophin with nNOS. This observation is in agreement with a strong decrease of nNOS immunolocalization in muscle biopsies, a parameter related to the severity of BMD phenotypes. The structural description of the whole dystrophin central domain we present here is a first necessary step to improve the design of microdystrophin constructs toward the goal of a successful gene therapy for DMD.

}, keywords = {Binding Sites, Dystrophin, Exons, Gene Deletion, Humans, Molecular Docking Simulation, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I, Protein Domains, Reading Frames, Scattering, Small Angle, Solutions, X-Ray Diffraction}, issn = {1083-351X}, doi = {10.1074/jbc.M117.809798}, author = {Delalande, Olivier and Molza, Anne-Elisabeth and Dos Santos Morais, Raphael and Ch{\'e}ron, Ang{\'e}lique and Pollet, {\'E}meline and Raguenes-Nicol, C{\'e}line and Tascon, Christophe and Giudice, Emmanuel and Guilbaud, Marine and Nicolas, Aur{\'e}lie and Bondon, Arnaud and Leturcq, France and Nicolas F{\'e}rey and Marc Baaden and Perez, Javier and Roblin, Pierre and Pi{\'e}tri-Rouxel, France and Hubert, Jean-Fran{\c c}ois and Czjzek, Mirjam and Le Rumeur, Elisabeth} } @article {2018|2087, title = {The major β-catenin/E-cadherin junctional binding site is a primary molecular mechano-transductor of differentiation .}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {7}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 07 19}, abstract = {

, the primary molecular mechanotransductive events mechanically initiating cell differentiation remain unknown. Here we find the molecular stretching of the highly conserved Y654-β-catenin-D665-E-cadherin binding site as mechanically induced by tissue strain. It triggers the increase of accessibility of the Y654 site, target of the Src42A kinase phosphorylation leading to irreversible unbinding. Molecular dynamics simulations of the β-catenin/E-cadherin complex under a force mimicking a 6 pN physiological mechanical strain predict a local 45\% stretching between the two α-helices linked by the site and a 15\% increase in accessibility of the phosphorylation site. Both are quantitatively observed using FRET lifetime imaging and non-phospho Y654 specific antibody labelling, in response to the mechanical strains developed by endogenous and magnetically mimicked early mesoderm invagination of gastrulating embryos. This is followed by the predicted release of 16\% of β-catenin from junctions, observed in FRAP, which initiates the mechanical activation of the β-catenin pathway process.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Armadillo Domain Proteins, Binding Sites, Cadherins, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src), Sequence Homology, Transcription Factors}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.33381}, author = {R{\"o}per, Jens-Christian and Mitrossilis, D{\'e}mosth{\`e}ne and Guillaume Stirnemann and Waharte, Fran{\c c}ois and Brito, Isabel and Fernandez-Sanchez, Maria-Elena and Marc Baaden and Salamero, Jean and Farge, Emmanuel} } @article {2014|1598, title = {A predicted binding site for cholesterol on the GABAA receptor.}, journal = {Biophys. J.}, volume = {106}, number = {9}, year = {2014}, month = {may}, pages = {1938{\textendash}1949}, publisher = {Department of Physics, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, New Jersey; Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University-Camden, Camden, New Jersey. Electronic address: Grace.Brannigan@rutgers.edu.}, abstract = {Modulation of the GABA type A receptor (GABAAR) function by cholesterol and other steroids is documented at the functional level, yet its structural basis is largely unknown. Current data on structurally related modulators suggest that cholesterol binds to subunit interfaces between transmembrane domains of the GABAAR. We construct homology models of a human GABAAR based on the structure of the glutamate-gated chloride channel GluCl of Caenorhabditis elegans. The models show the possibility of previously unreported disulfide bridges linking the M1 and M3 transmembrane helices in the α and γ subunits. We discuss the biological relevance of such disulfide bridges. Using our models, we investigate cholesterol binding to intersubunit cavities of the GABAAR transmembrane domain. We find that very similar binding modes are predicted independently by three approaches: analogy with ivermectin in the GluCl crystal structure, automated docking by AutoDock, and spontaneous rebinding events in unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. Taken together, the models and atomistic simulations suggest a somewhat flexible binding mode, with several possible orientations. Finally, we explore the possibility that cholesterol promotes pore opening through a wedge mechanism.}, keywords = {Amino Acid, Binding Sites, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, chemistry, chemistry/metabolism, Chloride Channels, Cholesterol, GABA-A, Humans, Hydrogen Bonding, Ivermectin, metabolism, Molecular Docking Simulation, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Porosity, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Sequence Homology, Substrate Specificity}, doi = {10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.024}, author = {J{\'e}r{\^o}me H{\'e}nin and Salari, Reza and Murlidaran, Sruthi and Grace Brannigan} } @article {2011|1665, title = {Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology.}, journal = {J. Mol. Biol.}, volume = {414}, year = {2011}, month = {nov}, pages = {289{\textendash}302}, abstract = {

The CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) and CASP (Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) experiments have demonstrated the power of community-wide tests of methodology in assessing the current state of the art and spurring progress in the very challenging areas of protein docking and structure prediction. We sought to bring the power of community-wide experiments to bear on a very challenging protein design problem that provides a complementary but equally fundamental test of current understanding of protein-binding thermodynamics. We have generated a number of designed protein-protein interfaces with very favorable computed binding energies but which do not appear to be formed in experiments, suggesting that there may be important physical chemistry missing in the energy calculations. A total of 28 research groups took up the challenge of determining what is missing: we provided structures of 87 designed complexes and 120 naturally occurring complexes and asked participants to identify energetic contributions and/or structural features that distinguish between the two sets. The community found that electrostatics and solvation terms partially distinguish the designs from the natural complexes, largely due to the nonpolar character of the designed interactions. Beyond this polarity difference, the community found that the designed binding surfaces were, on average, structurally less embedded in the designed monomers, suggesting that backbone conformational rigidity at the designed surface is important for realization of the designed function. These results can be used to improve computational design strategies, but there is still much to be learned; for example, one designed complex, which does form in experiments, was classified by all metrics as a nonbinder.

}, keywords = {Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins}, issn = {1089-8638}, doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.031}, author = {Fleishman, Sarel J and Whitehead, Timothy A and Strauch, Eva-Maria and Corn, Jacob E and Qin, Sanbo and Zhou, Huan-Xiang and Mitchell, Julie C and Demerdash, Omar N A and Takeda-Shitaka, Mayuko and Terashi, Genki and Moal, Iain H and Li, Xiaofan and Bates, Paul A and Martin Zacharias and Park, Hahnbeom and Ko, Jun-su and Lee, Hasup and Seok, Chaok and Bourquard, Thomas and Bernauer, Julie and Poupon, Anne and Az{\'e}, J{\'e}r{\^o}me and Soner, Seren and Ovali, Sefik Kerem and Ozbek, Pemra and Tal, Nir Ben and Haliloglu, T{\"u}rkan and Hwang, Howook and Vreven, Thom and Pierce, Brian G and Weng, Zhiping and P{\'e}rez-Cano, Laura and Pons, Carles and Fern{\'a}ndez-Recio, Juan and Jiang, Fan and Yang, Feng and Gong, Xinqi and Cao, Libin and Xu, Xianjin and Liu, Bin and Wang, Panwen and Li, Chunhua and Wang, Cunxin and Charles H. Robert and Guharoy, Mainak and Liu, Shiyong and Huang, Yangyu and Li, Lin and Guo, Dachuan and Chen, Ying and Xiao, Yi and London, Nir and Itzhaki, Zohar and Schueler-Furman, Ora and Inbar, Yuval and Potapov, Vladimir and Cohen, Mati and Schreiber, Gideon and Tsuchiya, Yuko and Kanamori, Eiji and Standley, Daron M and Nakamura, Haruki and Kinoshita, Kengo and Driggers, Camden M and Hall, Robert G and Morgan, Jessica L and Hsu, Victor L and Zhan, Jian and Yang, Yuedong and Zhou, Yaoqi and Kastritis, Panagiotis L and Bonvin, Alexandre M J J and Zhang, Weiyi and Camacho, Carlos J and Kilambi, Krishna P and Sircar, Aroop and Gray, Jeffrey J and Ohue, Masahito and Uchikoga, Nobuyuki and Matsuzaki, Yuri and Ishida, Takashi and Akiyama, Yutaka and Khashan, Raed and Bush, Stephen and Fouches, Denis and Tropsha, Alexander and Esquivel-Rodr{\'\i}guez, Juan and Kihara, Daisuke and Stranges, P Benjamin and Jacak, Ron and Kuhlman, Brian and Huang, Sheng-You and Zou, Xiaoqin and Wodak, Shoshana J and Janin, Jo{\"e}l and Baker, David} } @article {2009|2018, title = {Energy Flow and Long-Range Correlations in Guanine-Binding Riboswitch: A Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Study}, journal = {J. Phys. Chem. B}, volume = {113}, number = {27}, year = {2009}, month = {jul}, pages = {9340{\textendash}9347}, keywords = {Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Energy Transfer, Guanine, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Temperature}, doi = {10.1021/jp902013s}, author = {Phuong Hoang Nguyen and Philippe Derreumaux and Stock, Gerhard} } @article {2006|1935, title = {HDAC1 acetylation is linked to progressive modulation of steroid receptor-induced gene transcription.}, journal = {Mol. Cell}, volume = {22}, number = {5}, year = {2006}, month = {jun}, pages = {669{\textendash}679}, publisher = {Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, B602, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.}, abstract = {Although histone deacetylases (HDACs) are generally viewed as corepressors, we show that HDAC1 serves as a coactivator for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Furthermore, a subfraction of cellular HDAC1 is acetylated after association with the GR, and this acetylation event correlates with a decrease in promoter activity. HDAC1 in repressed chromatin is highly acetylated, while the deacetylase found on transcriptionally active chromatin manifests a low level of acetylation. Acetylation of purified HDAC1 inactivates its deacetylase activity, and mutation of the critical acetylation sites abrogates HDAC1 function in vivo. We propose that hormone activation of the receptor leads to progressive acetylation of HDAC1 in vivo, which in turn inhibits the deacetylase activity of the enzyme and prevents a deacetylation event that is required for promoter activation. These findings indicate that HDAC1 is required for the induction of some genes by the GR, and this activator function is dynamically modulated by acetylation.}, keywords = {Acetylation, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromatin, Down-Regulation, genetics/metabolism, Hela Cells, Histone Acetyltransferases, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, immunology/metabolism, metabolism}, doi = {10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.019}, author = {Yi Qiu and Yingming Zhao and Matthias Becker and Sam John and Bhavin S Parekh and Suming Huang and Anindya Hendarwanto and Elisabeth D Martinez and Yue Chen and Hanxin Lu and Nicholas L Adkins and Diana A Stavreva and Malgorzata Wiench and Philippe T Geor} }