@article {2018|2044,
	title = {Meet-U: Educating through research immersion},
	journal = {PLOS Computational Biology},
	volume = {14},
	year = {2018},
	month = {03},
	pages = {1-10},
	abstract = {<p>We present a new educational initiative called Meet-U that aims to train students for collaborative work in computational biology and to bridge the gap between education and research. Meet-U mimics the setup of collaborative research projects and takes advantage of the most popular tools for collaborative work and of cloud computing. Students are grouped in teams of 4\&ndash;5 people and have to realize a project from A to Z that answers a challenging question in biology. Meet-U promotes \&quot;coopetition,\&quot; as the students collaborate within and across the teams and are also in competition with each other to develop the best final product. Meet-U fosters interactions between different actors of education and research through the organization of a meeting day, open to everyone, where the students present their work to a jury of researchers and jury members give research seminars. This very unique combination of education and research is strongly motivating for the students and provides a formidable opportunity for a scientific community to unite and increase its visibility. We report on our experience with Meet-U in two French universities with master\&rsquo;s students in bioinformatics and modeling, with protein\&ndash;protein docking as the subject of the course. Meet-U is easy to implement and can be straightforwardly transferred to other fields and/or universities. All the information and data are available at www.meet-u.org.</p>
},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005992},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005992},
	author = {Abdollahi, Nika and Albani, Alexandre and Anthony, Eric and Baud, Agnes and Cardon, M{\'e}lissa and Clerc, Robert and Czernecki, Dariusz and Conte, Romain and David, Laurent and Delaune, Agathe and Djerroud, Samia and Fourgoux, Pauline and Guiglielmoni, Nad{\`e}ge and Laurentie, Jeanne and Lehmann, Nathalie and Lochard, Camille and Montagne, R{\'e}mi and Myrodia, Vasiliki and Opuu, Vaitea and Parey, Elise and Polit, L{\'e}lia and Priv{\'e}, Sylvain and Quignot, Chlo{\'e} and Ruiz-Cuevas, Maria and Sissoko, Mariam and Sompairac, Nicolas and Vallerix, Audrey and Verrecchia, Violaine and Delarue, Marc and Gu{\'e}rois, Raphael and Ponty, Yann and S Sacquin-Mora and Carbone, Alessandra and Froidevaux, Christine and Le Crom, St{\'e}phane and Lespinet, Olivier and Weigt, Martin and Abboud, Samer and Bernardes, Juliana and Bouvier, Guillaume and Dequeker, Chlo{\'e} and Ferr{\'e}, Arnaud and Fuchs, Patrick and Lelandais, Ga{\"e}lle and Poulain, Pierre and Richard, Hugues and Schweke, Hugo and Laine, Elodie and Lopes, Anne}
}
@article {2011|1665,
	title = {Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology.},
	journal = {J. Mol. Biol.},
	volume = {414},
	year = {2011},
	month = {nov},
	pages = {289{\textendash}302},
	abstract = {<p>The CAPRI (Critical Assessment of Predicted Interactions) and CASP (Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) experiments have demonstrated the power of community-wide tests of methodology in assessing the current state of the art and spurring progress in the very challenging areas of protein docking and structure prediction. We sought to bring the power of community-wide experiments to bear on a very challenging protein design problem that provides a complementary but equally fundamental test of current understanding of protein-binding thermodynamics. We have generated a number of designed protein-protein interfaces with very favorable computed binding energies but which do not appear to be formed in experiments, suggesting that there may be important physical chemistry missing in the energy calculations. A total of 28 research groups took up the challenge of determining what is missing: we provided structures of 87 designed complexes and 120 naturally occurring complexes and asked participants to identify energetic contributions and/or structural features that distinguish between the two sets. The community found that electrostatics and solvation terms partially distinguish the designs from the natural complexes, largely due to the nonpolar character of the designed interactions. Beyond this polarity difference, the community found that the designed binding surfaces were, on average, structurally less embedded in the designed monomers, suggesting that backbone conformational rigidity at the designed surface is important for realization of the designed function. These results can be used to improve computational design strategies, but there is still much to be learned; for example, one designed complex, which does form in experiments, was classified by all metrics as a nonbinder.</p>},
	keywords = {Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins},
	issn = {1089-8638},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.031},
	author = {Fleishman, Sarel J and Whitehead, Timothy A and Strauch, Eva-Maria and Corn, Jacob E and Qin, Sanbo and Zhou, Huan-Xiang and Mitchell, Julie C and Demerdash, Omar N A and Takeda-Shitaka, Mayuko and Terashi, Genki and Moal, Iain H and Li, Xiaofan and Bates, Paul A and Martin Zacharias and Park, Hahnbeom and Ko, Jun-su and Lee, Hasup and Seok, Chaok and Bourquard, Thomas and Bernauer, Julie and Poupon, Anne and Az{\'e}, J{\'e}r{\^o}me and Soner, Seren and Ovali, Sefik Kerem and Ozbek, Pemra and Tal, Nir Ben and Haliloglu, T{\"u}rkan and Hwang, Howook and Vreven, Thom and Pierce, Brian G and Weng, Zhiping and P{\'e}rez-Cano, Laura and Pons, Carles and Fern{\'a}ndez-Recio, Juan and Jiang, Fan and Yang, Feng and Gong, Xinqi and Cao, Libin and Xu, Xianjin and Liu, Bin and Wang, Panwen and Li, Chunhua and Wang, Cunxin and Charles H. Robert and Guharoy, Mainak and Liu, Shiyong and Huang, Yangyu and Li, Lin and Guo, Dachuan and Chen, Ying and Xiao, Yi and London, Nir and Itzhaki, Zohar and Schueler-Furman, Ora and Inbar, Yuval and Potapov, Vladimir and Cohen, Mati and Schreiber, Gideon and Tsuchiya, Yuko and Kanamori, Eiji and Standley, Daron M and Nakamura, Haruki and Kinoshita, Kengo and Driggers, Camden M and Hall, Robert G and Morgan, Jessica L and Hsu, Victor L and Zhan, Jian and Yang, Yuedong and Zhou, Yaoqi and Kastritis, Panagiotis L and Bonvin, Alexandre M J J and Zhang, Weiyi and Camacho, Carlos J and Kilambi, Krishna P and Sircar, Aroop and Gray, Jeffrey J and Ohue, Masahito and Uchikoga, Nobuyuki and Matsuzaki, Yuri and Ishida, Takashi and Akiyama, Yutaka and Khashan, Raed and Bush, Stephen and Fouches, Denis and Tropsha, Alexander and Esquivel-Rodr{\'\i}guez, Juan and Kihara, Daisuke and Stranges, P Benjamin and Jacak, Ron and Kuhlman, Brian and Huang, Sheng-You and Zou, Xiaoqin and Wodak, Shoshana J and Janin, Jo{\"e}l and Baker, David}
}
@article {2010|1444,
	title = {{T}he molecular recognition mechanism for superoxide dismutase presequence binding to the mitochondrial protein import receptor {T}om20 from {O}ryza sativa involves an {L}{R}{T}{L}{A} motif},
	journal = {J. Phys. Chem. B},
	volume = {114},
	year = {2010},
	month = {nov},
	pages = {13839{\textendash}13846},
	author = {Y. Zhang and Marc Baaden and J. Yan and J. Shao and S. Qiu and Y. Wu and Y. Ding}
}
@article {2006|1935,
	title = {HDAC1 acetylation is linked to progressive modulation of steroid receptor-induced gene transcription.},
	journal = {Mol. Cell},
	volume = {22},
	number = {5},
	year = {2006},
	month = {jun},
	pages = {669{\textendash}679},
	publisher = {Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, B602, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.},
	abstract = {Although histone deacetylases (HDACs) are generally viewed as corepressors, we show that HDAC1 serves as a coactivator for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Furthermore, a subfraction of cellular HDAC1 is acetylated after association with the GR, and this acetylation event correlates with a decrease in promoter activity. HDAC1 in repressed chromatin is highly acetylated, while the deacetylase found on transcriptionally active chromatin manifests a low level of acetylation. Acetylation of purified HDAC1 inactivates its deacetylase activity, and mutation of the critical acetylation sites abrogates HDAC1 function in vivo. We propose that hormone activation of the receptor leads to progressive acetylation of HDAC1 in vivo, which in turn inhibits the deacetylase activity of the enzyme and prevents a deacetylation event that is required for promoter activation. These findings indicate that HDAC1 is required for the induction of some genes by the GR, and this activator function is dynamically modulated by acetylation.},
	keywords = {Acetylation, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Cycle Proteins, Chromatin, Down-Regulation, genetics/metabolism, Hela Cells, Histone Acetyltransferases, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, immunology/metabolism, metabolism},
	doi = {10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.019},
	author = {Yi Qiu and Yingming Zhao and Matthias Becker and Sam John and Bhavin S Parekh and Suming Huang and Anindya Hendarwanto and Elisabeth D Martinez and Yue Chen and Hanxin Lu and Nicholas L Adkins and Diana A Stavreva and Malgorzata Wiench and Philippe T Geor}
}
